Tribal Dungeons of Global Shipping: AI Agents at Global Scale — Dmitry Buykin, Maersk
Maersk’s production agents depend less on a clever loop than on executable SOPs, bounded tools, replayable traces, and a correction system shared by experts and engineers.
Maersk runs **over 200 agent instances** for shipping operations, where legacy systems can stretch latency from minutes to **10 minutes**. Its executable SOP corpus captures preconditions, decisions, calls, validation, recovery, and evidence.
Treat the harness and correction loop as the product. Convert screenshots and expert habits into testable procedures, constrain production rights, cluster failures, and replay real cases before promoting changes.
Maersk runs **over 200 agent instances** for shipping operations, where legacy systems can stretch latency from minutes to **10 minutes**. Its executable SOP corpus captures preconditions, decisions, calls, validation, recovery, and evidence. Treat the harness and correction loop as the product. Convert screenshots and expert habits into testable procedures, constrain production rights, cluster failures, and replay real cases before promoting changes. This approach required **over 100,000 corrections in 9 months**, with expert time still the bottleneck. The talk reports Maersk’s operating method, not a portable benchmark or proof that the same architecture fits smaller workflows.
This turns familiar harness controls into evidence from a large, latency-heavy production operation: reliability comes from executable procedures, constrained rights, replay, and an institutional correction loop. The volume of corrections and continuing expert bottleneck narrow the automation claim, showing that stronger infrastructure reorganizes domain labor rather than eliminating it, and that the pattern is not automatically portable to smaller workflows.